Author Archives: Admin

Unknown's avatar

About Admin

Hello, My name is Oni. I was a victim of a dirty bad housing fraud back in 2003. This woman who I will not name on my website was pretending to be me, and take over my identity she lived in the city of Palmdale California Not only did this person purchase a home in Palmdale California under my credit profile' but she also took out credit cards in my name, and also took out many loans on the home she bought with my credit information Then she did the worst thing to my credit profile she went to Bankruptcy court-filed documents in my name and credit profile. I only found out when trying to use a credit card I had not used in many years. I called this cardholder to find out my limit so I could make a purchase for my husband's Christmas gift. But to my surprise, this cardholder told me I had no credit limit on this card because I filed for bankruptcy last month in September of 2003. I stated to the company cardholder there must be some mistake I do not own a home at this time and lived in a townhouse over 100 miles away from where this bankruptcy took place. He stated to me yes we have updates on the cardholders monthly, and we took away all of the credit limits from this card and closed my account down. Now was I very pissed off, angry to find out that not only did someone use my name but they purchase a home in my name, and also filed Bankruptcy on credit profiles. I then went to the net to find out if I really own a house in my name. I got myself an updated credit history report. I found out this guy was right I did own a home in Palmdale, and I filed Bankruptcy by their records this was correct. I was so upset since I was in the process of building a home out in the high desert, was in the process of getting a loan with my credit score being 750 with 3 open accounts in good credit standings. My next move was to prove who I was, and where I lived for over 10 years. A police report was filed in the city where I live at this time in 2003. I gave the police my fingerprints at the Long Beach police department, and my handwriting so that I would have this on file for my court case. Someone was going to pay for what was done to me. I contacted the loan people and told them who I was and that I wanted them to remove this from my credit profile since have not filled out any type of paperwork with them on any loans. They laugh at me and said I should have paid my payment on this home that this low-down dirty woman bought in my name, and credit profile. I then called the Bankruptcy court where the case took place. Nice men there asked me, for the social security number I gave him my number he did a deep search, could not find any kind of files with my SSI, Are Bankruptcy filed in my name at all. I then gave him the credit reports I purchased online. He said this was not my Bankruptcy at all there were 3 numbers turned around but it was a close match but The name was very different spelled among other things. He said I am going to send you out a report of the Bankruptcy that was in your name but not SSN. I contacted a law firm on this matter. I had tried many times to over, and over to work things out with the bank over this huge mix-up. They lied to me after I went out, and paid for services to help them get their funds back from this house that did not belong to me at all since this was in my name, social. I got sick, and tired of the banks after they sold this home while I was on vacation out of the states. A call was left on my home phone that they lied to the people I paid to help them get their money back from this fraud identity case done in my name. After all this big mess with my credit profile, I had to get help from a law firm who I told my story and handed him the proof I could have never done this bankruptcy in court I was taking class finals over a 100 mile plus away, and the handwriting did not match my writing at all. We went to court I took everyone to court on this matter. I wanted my credit fixed, and I was not taking any more crap from anyone over this home a loan that someone did in my name. I won my case in court, and that was easy to do since I went back to the court where the Bankruptcy had been done in the first place. The Judge who did the Bankruptcy remembers the case and the women that came on the day of the Bankruptcy hearing, and Guess what I was not the woman that came into her court at all, she told them, creditors, that this is not the woman that came into this court, and filed bankruptcy. She told them to clean up my credit reports, and that she needed to see these reports for the next couple of months if they should show back up my attorney would contact her again on this matter. The judge said any fool can see the handwriting does not match the police handwriting files, and the fingerprints did not match sure do not match this on other fraud documents that this woman had done in my name. I am proof the judge said this woman in my court today. I have never seen before in my court room until today, and she is not the person who did this Bankruptcy in this case? The judge made them pay me, and also fix all my credit back like it was before all this happen, and they had 2 weeks to do it, and the judge wanted all my credit reports in 2 weeks show they took all these loans and negative stuff off my reports. My reports were back to normal but I had to stay up on it every few months. The loans were sold again, and again. I got many collectors trying to collect on a court case that had been settled because they sold the loans over, and over again in my name. I wrote everyone who put things on my profile that they had a week to get it off or I would have them in court for trying to collect on loans done in my identity being stolen, and that was not mine, the court has cleared up this matter. I had no problems at all the stuff was taken off right away. But I still keep up with all the credit cards I do own and monitor my credit profiles every. few months, taking time to write these people back was a big every few months task for me. This is the reason I made a website to share my store of how my credit report was destroyed by fraud. Dirtybadcreditreport.com I hope my credit story can help those who have been going through fraud among other types of credit problems, remember this fraud is everywhere, no one is safe out in this world today.

New Federal Income Tax Laws for 2010, 2011

Are you up-to-date on the new tax laws that will be imposed for 2010 and 2011? The changes that have been put into place could save you a lot of money.

First of all the standard deductions will be increased for most taxpayers. The increased amounts are reflected by the status you file for example:

* Married couples filing jointly will be able to take a standard deduction of $11,400.
* For Singles and Married couples filing separately they can take a standard deduction of $5,700.

Other changes you can expect in this year are:

* You can contribute more in your 401K-retirement account and your IRA account before having to pay tax on it.
* The mileage deduction has decreased by 2.5cents.
* The gift tax exclusion has increased by $1,000.
* The earned income credit has increased more than $2,000 from 2008.

These changes are just some of the new tax rules. To make sure you are benefiting from all of the changes that will be put into place you should prepare your taxes online. Online services can be a great help in keeping you up to date on the ever changing tax laws.

Most services ask you a series of questions based on you’re filing status and tax situation to make sure all of the necessary tax forms have been completed and are accurate.

Preparing your tax return is stressful enough, wouldn’t it be great to have a guarantee that your return is accurate and you have been guaranteed the biggest refund possible according to the new laws and amounts that can change every single year.

TurboTax Online does just that. They are a safe and secure service to help ease the process of filing your tax return. Their detailed system makes sure you have claimed all of the deductions available to you while checking your return for errors to guarantee the accuracy and reducing your risk of an audit.

The Credit CARD Act, Defined

The full name of this law is the Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility and Disclosure Act of 2009. It is more commonly referred to as the Credit CARD Act. The U.S. Congress passed this act in May of 2009, and it was signed into law by President Obama shortly thereafter. It’s an amendment to the Truth in Lending Act, which was created back in 1968.

This law is designed to protect consumers from the abusive practices of the credit card industry. These regulations will prevent a variety of abusive penalties, fees, interest rate changes, and other money-making “tricks” that have been used for years. In short, the new laws prevent card issuers from taking advantage of consumers.

How to Report Violations

How to Report Violations

These new laws are actually an amendment to the Truth in Lending Act. So it’s the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) that enforces these laws. If you believe your card issuer has violated some aspect of this act, you should report them to the FTC. The company could be fined up to $5,000 per violation. If you need to file a complaint, just visit the FTC website and look for the link that says “file a complaint.” From there, just follow the instructions that are given to you

Credit Changes August 22, 2010 – Next Round of Credit Card Laws

Starting on the above date, and at least every six months, credit card companies must review all of the rate increases they’ve made, dating back to January 1, 2009. During this review process, they must reassess the risk factors that prompted them to increase the cardholder’s rate and APR. If they feel the increase was justified, they must explain it to the customer in writing. Otherwise, they must reverse the increase.

As you can see, there are many significant changes that will take place during this three-phased implementation. In fact, this new set of credit card laws represents the largest overhaul of financial regulation since the Truth in Lending Act was created in 1968. These laws will protect consumers from many (but not all) of the abusive practices that card issuers have developed over the years.

Credit Changes February 22, 2010 – Summary of Changes

The majority of new regulations went into effect on this date. They include the following requirements:

1. Your credit card company cannot increase the interest rate or fees (APR) on your existing balance for one year after the account is opened. In other words, the so-called “retroactive rate increases” are now prohibited.

2. There are some exceptions to the above-stated rule. The card issuer can increase the APR for an existing balance if: (A) they disclose such an increase when the account was opened; (B) you’re using a variable-rate card, and the published index has increased; (C) you have completed a pre-arranged “workout” plan, such as a debt-reduction agreement; or (D) you are delinquent on a payment by 60 days or more.

3. Once your credit card account has been open for more than a year, the company can raise your interest rate. But the new / higher rate can only be applied to new purchases made after the first year. Additionally, this kind of rate increase must be disclosed to you at the time you open your account.

4. If you have a card with multiple interest rates, any amount you pay above the minimum payment must be applied to the balance with the highest interest rate first. For example, if you have a low rate for a balance that you transferred from another card, but a higher rate on all new transactions, any amount you pay over the minimum must be applied to the higher-interest balance first. This obviously works to your advantage.

5. The new credit card laws also prohibit what is commonly referred to as double-cycle billing, or two cycle billing. This is when they assign interest rate charges for the current balance as well as the average daily balance from the last billing period. Starting in February 22, 2010, the new laws will outlaw these double-cycle billing practices.

6. Some changes are designed to improve disclosures made by your credit card company. For example, when they send you your statement, it must include a box that shows you how much you’ve paid in interest and fees during the current year. Your statement must also clearly explain the consequences of making only the minimum payment each month.

7. Your statement must also tell you the monthly payment that would be required to pay off your existing balance within three years (including interest). This disclosure is particularly helpful for people who want to eliminate their credit card balances altogether, perhaps through a debt-reduction plan.

8. Your statements must also clearly show the due date for your next payment, as well as any fees that might be imposed for late payments. It must show the date after which you would encounter such a penalty.

9. Card companies can no longer change the payment due date from one month to the next. In the past, this was one of their favorite tricks used to impose penalties. Going forward, the due date for your payments must be on the same day each month.

10. To piggyback on the change mentioned above, your credit card company must accept your payment if it is received by 5 PM local time on the due date. In other words, they can no longer establish early morning deadlines as a way of imposing a late-payment fees.

11. After February 22, 2010, your credit card company will no longer allow purchases that exceed your credit limit, unless you “opt in” to such an arrangement. This was another one of the industry’s favorite tools for generating penalty fees. In the past, if you made purchases beyond your limit, the card company would allow the transaction and charge you a hefty fee. Going forward, however, you must choose to participate in such over-the-limit processing. Otherwise, these transactions will be denied at the point-of-sale.

12. With this wave of changes, there will also be some new rules relating to younger consumers. Consumers under the age of 21 must now have a cosigner to open a credit card account, or else they must document their financial ability to repay the debts. Here is some related information on the subject.

What the New Credit Card Laws Mean to YOU

This is a guest post from Adam Jusko, founder of IndexCreditCards.com, an information and comparison site for credit cards that maintains a list of over 1200 cards. You can follow Adam on Twitter for quick credit tips and opinions. I’ve mentioned Index Credit Cards many times before, most notably in my post from 2006 called “The Only Credit Card Guide You’ll Ever Need”.

Last May President Obama signed into law a sweeping set of rules and regulations concerning the business practices of credit card issuers. Known as the Credit Card Act, the new laws
promised a level playing field where consumers would be treated more fairly and credit card terms would be easier to understand.

But, much like your favorite credit card agreement, the law had something nasty buried in the fine print — no part of the law would take effect immediately. Instead, certain pieces of the law didn’t take effect until August, and many others have an effective date of February 2010. Credit card issuers used the window between the law’s signing and its actual enforcement to raise rates, slash credit limits, or even completely take your card away.

Card issuers claim the new rules restrict their ability to price cards based on risk, and will lead to higher prices for everyone. Politicians might call the card issuers’ reactions to the new law “unintended consequences,” and tell you that leveling the playing field unfortunately means that some people get leveled on the way toward a fairer marketplace. (Actually, no politician would ever say that.)

What’s the truth? What exactly do these new laws do? And, what can you expect in the coming years when you use your credit cards or attempt to get new ones?

Let’s start with what the law actually says. It’s long, so I’ll bullet point it as much as possible. (Go here if you want to read it in all its glory.)

Now playing
Here’s what went into effect in August of 2009:

* Credit card issuers must give you 45 days notice if they intend to raise your rates. Further, they must allow you to “opt out” of the rate increase and pay your existing balance under the old rate terms.

* Credit card issuers must send bills at least 21 days before the due date.

What it means: Credit card issuers can no longer jack up your rates with little warning, and you now have the option to decline the rate increase. However, declining an increase means you can no longer use the card and it gives the issuer the freedom to increase your minimum payment to either twice its previous level or to a level that guarantees the card will be paid off within five years. So, if you decline, be sure you have a better card option going forward.

Coming soon
Next up are the regulations due to kick in next month. I’ll take them in chunks, based on rules that naturally go together:

* Credit card rates can’t be increased on outstanding balances — except for the increase that happens when a 0% or other low interest introductory rate expires on newly-issued cards or when a customer is 60 days late on a payment.

* If a customer is 60 days late on a payment and an interest rate is increased, the issuer must dial the rate back to the original level if the customer pays the past-due payments and makes 6 straight months of on-time minimum payments.

* Card rates can not be increased in the first year of a card agreement (unless there is a limited-time low-interest introductory rate as part of the original card offer).

* Low-interest introductory rate offers must last at least 6 months.

* Customer payments must be applied to higher-interest balances first.

* If a card is marketed as “fixed rate,” the card issuer must reveal exactly how long the rate is guaranteed to remain the same.

* Credit card issuers can not use “double-cycle billing,” a practice that allowed issuers to charge interest based on the average balance from the past two months, even if last month’s balance was paid.

What it means: Out of all the new rules, the ones above are probably the greatest victory for consumers, and probably the most harmful to card issuers’ profits. In general, they say that any purchase you make must be charged interest only at the card’s interest rate when the purchase was made. Even if the issuer hikes your rate, the higher rate only would apply to new purchases going forward. Credit card issuers are really screaming about this — they believe it stops them from penalizing bad customers who turn into bigger credit risks, and they threaten that it will stop them from accepting many consumers altogether.

From my perspective, it’s simple fairness — even if a person becomes a bigger credit risk, I see no reason issuers should be able to “bait and switch” by increasing the rates on previous purchases made under different terms. This practice has forced many credit card customers to get into desperate financial straits. What card issuers may be missing in their anger is the possibility that fewer cardholders will default on their cards under these regulations, because they won’t suddenly be saddled with payments that are double those required previously.

Here’s the next set of rules:

* Payment due dates must be the same each month. If a due date falls on a weekend or holiday, the due date must change to the following business day.

* Issuers can’t charge fees for payments by certain methods. For example, issuers can not charge customers more if they pay by phone than if they pay online.

* Issuers can’t allow customers to go over their credit limits and then charge “over the limit fees” unless the customer has first “opted in” — specifically asking for the service.

* Issuers must include a place on the bill that shows customers how long it would take to pay off their balances if only the minimum required payment was paid each month. (Other similar disclosure rules are still being developed.)

What it means: Most of these fall under the “sneaky tricks” portion of the rules, in order to stop issuers from charging you fees for things that seem quite reasonable. For example, you shouldn’t be charged a late fee if your payment can’t be delivered on a due date that happens to be a Sunday, and card issuers shouldn’t be giving you a credit limit and then allowing you to go over that limit as a “service” that charges you an extra fee.

The last two rules are targeted at specific cardholder groups:

* Issuers may not charge upfront fees that are greater than 25% of a card’s credit limit.

* Issuers may not issue cards to people under 21, unless the customer has proof of income or has a co-signer who accepts responsibility for the card.

What it means: The first point is targeted at “subprime” cards for those with poor credit. A common industry practice when targeting bad credit customers has been to offer a low credit limit and then charge upfront fees that eat up most of the limit. For example, you sign up for a card with a $500 limit, but there are $450 in fees in order to get the card, so you start off with a $450 balance and only $50 in actual spending power. Desperate customers have been willing to take this deal, but no more.

The second point may kill the college student credit card market. Card issuers have long targeted college students, trying to “get them early” in hopes of creating brand loyalty. Lawmakers felt too many students were getting cards they couldn’t pay for, leaving college with thousands of dollars in debt.

What the future holds
While the Credit Card Act has thankfully rid us of many unfair practices going forward, the card issuers’ frenzied attempt to either hike rates or kick out unprofitable customers has left many between a rock and a hard place. In the past, a customer who was treated poorly by one credit card company could simply turn to another, with the likelihood being they’d be welcomed with open arms. Today, and at least for the next year or so, I believe consumers will have difficulty obtaining new credit cards, especially consumers with average credit or worse. This is bad news for those stuck in a high-rate situation.

What comes later is likely to be a good-news/bad-news situation. Credit will become more accessible again, but in the future it will more likely come with an annual fee, or with fewer if any rewards on purchases, or with new fees that have yet to be devised. The credit card industry has proven to very adaptable, and while it’s a sure thing that they’ll play nice legally, that doesn’t mean future credit card agreements will be written with your best interests at heart.